Future of Information and Communication Conference (FICC) 2024
4-5 April 2024
Publication Links
IJACSA
Special Issues
Future of Information and Communication Conference (FICC)
Computing Conference
Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys)
Future Technologies Conference (FTC)
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), Volume 4 Issue 9, 2013.
Abstract: Aspect-oriented programming (AOP) has been introduced as a potential programming approach for the specification of nonfunctional component properties, such as fault-tolerance, logging and exception handling. Such properties are referred to as crosscutting concerns and represent critical issues that conventional programming approaches could not modularize effectively leading to a complex code. This paper discusses AOP concept, the necessity that led to it, how it provides better results in code quality and software development efficiency, followed by stating challenges that developers and researchers face when dealing with this approach. It has been concluded that AOP is promising and deserves more attention from developers and researchers. However, more systematic evaluation studies should be conducted to better understand its implications.
Heba A. Kurdi, “Review on Aspect Oriented Programming” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 4(9), 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040904
@article{Kurdi2013,
title = {Review on Aspect Oriented Programming},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications},
doi = {10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040904},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2013.040904},
year = {2013},
publisher = {The Science and Information Organization},
volume = {4},
number = {9},
author = {Heba A. Kurdi}
}
Copyright Statement: This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, even commercially as long as the original work is properly cited.