The Science and Information (SAI) Organization
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Contact Us

Publication Links

  • IJACSA
  • Author Guidelines
  • Publication Policies
  • Digital Archiving Policy
  • Promote your Publication
  • Metadata Harvesting (OAI2)

IJACSA

  • About the Journal
  • Call for Papers
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit your Paper
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Fees/ APC
  • Reviewers
  • Apply as a Reviewer

IJARAI

  • About the Journal
  • Archives
  • Indexing & Archiving

Special Issues

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Proposals
  • GIDP 2026
  • ICONS_BA 2025

Computer Vision Conference (CVC)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Computing Conference

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Future Technologies Conference (FTC)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Editorial Board
  • Guidelines
  • Submit
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Fees
  • Reviewers
  • RSS Feed

DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2025.01610108
PDF

A Comparison Between FAHP-TOPSIS and FAHP-FTOPSIS Methods for Selecting the Best Products for Home-Based Sellers: A Performance Analysis

Author 1: Selvia Lorena Br Ginting
Author 2: Zulaiha Ali Othman

International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), Volume 16 Issue 10, 2025.

  • Abstract and Keywords
  • How to Cite this Article
  • {} BibTeX Source

Abstract: This study discusses common problems faced by home-based sellers in determining the right product ideas to sell. To overcome this problem, a method is needed that can help home-based sellers to choose the right product. Therefore, a decision support system using a multi-criteria decision-making technique with a hybrid approach was applied, which integrates the FAHP-TOPSIS and FAHP-FTOPSIS methods in the product selection process. The analysis results show that the FAHP-TOPSIS method is more effective in producing product rankings, with alternative A5948 ranking first with a score of 0.946. Meanwhile, the FAHP-FTOPSIS method also placed the same alternative in first place with a score of 0.679. The findings in the ranking analysis showed that the addition of fuzzy did not affect the rankings but did affect the score value of the alternatives. Sensitivity Analysis using Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD), Mean Square Error (MSE), and Spearman Correlation (SC) was conducted. FAHP-TOPSIS performed best at Weight 1 (MAD 89, MSE 18.486, SC 0.972) and excelled at Weight 3 (MAD 144, MSE 51.791, SC 0.997), though more volatile at other weights. Overall, at the base weight (Weight 1), TOPSIS shows the best ranking stability (low MAD/MSE, high SC), while with shifted weights (especially Weight 3), FTOPSIS better maintains ordering (SC ≈ 1) despite higher error at Weight 2. Practically, TOPSIS suits baseline scenarios; FTOPSIS is more robust under weight variations, with error variance control still necessary. These findings provide a practical guideline: use FAHP-FTOPSIS when preferences are uncertain, and use FAHP-TOPSIS when preferences are clear. The resulting rankings can be directly adopted by sellers to prioritize and select products with confidence.

Keywords: Home-based sellers; product selection; FAHP-TOPSIS; FAHP-FTOPSIS; sensitivity analysis

Selvia Lorena Br Ginting and Zulaiha Ali Othman. “A Comparison Between FAHP-TOPSIS and FAHP-FTOPSIS Methods for Selecting the Best Products for Home-Based Sellers: A Performance Analysis”. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA) 16.10 (2025). http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.01610108

@article{Ginting2025,
title = {A Comparison Between FAHP-TOPSIS and FAHP-FTOPSIS Methods for Selecting the Best Products for Home-Based Sellers: A Performance Analysis},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications},
doi = {10.14569/IJACSA.2025.01610108},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.01610108},
year = {2025},
publisher = {The Science and Information Organization},
volume = {16},
number = {10},
author = {Selvia Lorena Br Ginting and Zulaiha Ali Othman}
}



Copyright Statement: This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, even commercially as long as the original work is properly cited.

IJACSA

Upcoming Conferences

Computer Vision Conference (CVC) 2026

21-22 May 2026

  • Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Computing Conference 2026

9-10 July 2026

  • London, United Kingdom

Artificial Intelligence Conference 2026

3-4 September 2026

  • Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2026

15-16 October 2026

  • Berlin, Germany
The Science and Information (SAI) Organization
BACK TO TOP

Computer Science Journal

  • About the Journal
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit Paper
  • Indexing

Our Conferences

  • Computer Vision Conference
  • Computing Conference
  • Intelligent Systems Conference
  • Future Technologies Conference

Help & Support

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

© The Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited. All rights reserved. Registered in England and Wales. Company Number 8933205. thesai.org