The Science and Information (SAI) Organization
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Contact Us

Publication Links

  • IJACSA
  • Author Guidelines
  • Publication Policies
  • Outstanding Reviewers

IJACSA

  • About the Journal
  • Call for Papers
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit your Paper
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Fees/ APC
  • Reviewers
  • Apply as a Reviewer

IJARAI

  • About the Journal
  • Archives
  • Indexing & Archiving

Special Issues

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Proposals
  • ICONS_BA 2025

Computer Vision Conference (CVC)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Computing Conference

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Future Technologies Conference (FTC)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Editorial Board
  • Guidelines
  • Submit
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Fees
  • Reviewers
  • RSS Feed

DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160948
PDF

Performance Analysis of Spectrogram-Based Versus Raw Waveform-Based Deep Learning Models for Smoker Detection from Cough Audio

Author 1: Widi Nugroho
Author 2: Alhadi Bustamam
Author 3: Rinaldi Anwar Buyung

International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), Volume 16 Issue 9, 2025.

  • Abstract and Keywords
  • How to Cite this Article
  • {} BibTeX Source

Abstract: The classification of cough sounds for smoker detection represents a challenging task in audio processing that compares different data representation methods. This study presents a performance analysis of two prominent deep learning approaches: a spectrogram-based model, the Audio Spectrogram Transformer (AST), and a raw waveform-based model, Wav2Vec2. We used 7,561 smoker and 7,561 non-smoker samples from the CODA TB DREAM Challenge dataset. Both models were trained with five-fold cross-validation and data augmentation (SpecAugment for AST; noise, pitch, and time shifts for Wav2Vec2). The raw waveform-based Wav2Vec2 model achieved the best performance, with an average accuracy of 86.5%, an F1-score of 0.862, and an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.945, completing training in approximately 49 minutes per fold. In contrast, the spectrogram-based AST model reached around 76-77% accuracy and an AUC of 0.85 in approximately 78 minutes per fold. These findings indicate that the raw waveform-based approach is significantly more effective and computationally efficient than the spectrogram-based approach for this task, offering a robust method for non-invasive smoker classification through the analysis of vocal biomarkers.

Keywords: Smoker detection; cough audio classification; deep learning; Audio Spectrogram Transformer; Wav2Vec2; vocal biomarker

Widi Nugroho, Alhadi Bustamam and Rinaldi Anwar Buyung. “Performance Analysis of Spectrogram-Based Versus Raw Waveform-Based Deep Learning Models for Smoker Detection from Cough Audio”. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA) 16.9 (2025). http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160948

@article{Nugroho2025,
title = {Performance Analysis of Spectrogram-Based Versus Raw Waveform-Based Deep Learning Models for Smoker Detection from Cough Audio},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications},
doi = {10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160948},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160948},
year = {2025},
publisher = {The Science and Information Organization},
volume = {16},
number = {9},
author = {Widi Nugroho and Alhadi Bustamam and Rinaldi Anwar Buyung}
}



Copyright Statement: This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, even commercially as long as the original work is properly cited.

IJACSA

Upcoming Conferences

Computer Vision Conference (CVC) 2026

21-22 May 2026

  • Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Computing Conference 2026

9-10 July 2026

  • London, United Kingdom

Artificial Intelligence Conference 2026

3-4 September 2026

  • Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Future Technologies Conference (FTC) 2026

15-16 October 2026

  • Berlin, Germany
The Science and Information (SAI) Organization
BACK TO TOP

Computer Science Journal

  • About the Journal
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit Paper
  • Indexing

Our Conferences

  • Computer Vision Conference
  • Computing Conference
  • Intelligent Systems Conference
  • Future Technologies Conference

Help & Support

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

The Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited is a company registered in England and Wales under Company Number 8933205.