The Science and Information (SAI) Organization
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Journals
  • Conferences
  • Contact Us

Publication Links

  • IJACSA
  • Author Guidelines
  • Publication Policies
  • Digital Archiving Policy
  • Promote your Publication
  • Metadata Harvesting (OAI2)

IJACSA

  • About the Journal
  • Call for Papers
  • Editorial Board
  • Author Guidelines
  • Submit your Paper
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Fees/ APC
  • Reviewers
  • Apply as a Reviewer

IJARAI

  • About the Journal
  • Archives
  • Indexing & Archiving

Special Issues

  • Home
  • Archives
  • Proposals
  • Guest Editors
  • SUSAI-EE 2025
  • ICONS-BA 2025
  • IoT-BLOCK 2025

Future of Information and Communication Conference (FICC)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Computing Conference

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Intelligent Systems Conference (IntelliSys)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact

Future Technologies Conference (FTC)

  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit your Paper/Poster
  • Register
  • Venue
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Call for Papers
  • Editorial Board
  • Guidelines
  • Submit
  • Current Issue
  • Archives
  • Indexing
  • Fees
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribe

DOI: 10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100244
PDF

A Qualitative Comparison of NoSQL Data Stores

Author 1: Sarah H. Kamal
Author 2: Hanan H. Elazhary
Author 3: Ehab E. Hassanein

International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), Volume 10 Issue 2, 2019.

  • Abstract and Keywords
  • How to Cite this Article
  • {} BibTeX Source

Abstract: Due to the proliferation of big data with large volume, velocity, complexity, and distribution among remote servers, it became obvious that traditional relational databases are unsuitable for meeting the requirements of such data. This led to the emergence of a novel technology among organizations and business enterprises; NoSQL datastores. Today such datastores have become popular alternatives to traditional relational databases, since their schema-less data models can manipulate and handle a huge amount of structured, semi-structured and unstructured data, with high speed and immense distribution. Those data stores are of four basic types, and numerous instances have been developed under each type. This implies the need to understand the differences among them and how to select the most suitable one for any given data. Unfortunately, research efforts in the literature either consider differences from a theoretical point of view (without real use cases), or address performance issues such as speed and storage, which is insufficient to give researchers deep insight into the mapping of a given data structure to a given NoSQL datastore type. Hence, this paper provides a qualitative comparison among three popular datastores of different types (Redis, Neo4j, and MongoDB) using a real use case of each type, translated to the others. It thus highlights the inherent differences among them, and hence what data structures each of them suits most.

Keywords: Document datastores; graph datastores; key-value datastores; MonoDB; Neo4j; NoSQL datastores; Redis

Sarah H. Kamal, Hanan H. Elazhary and Ehab E. Hassanein, “A Qualitative Comparison of NoSQL Data Stores” International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 10(2), 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100244

@article{Kamal2019,
title = {A Qualitative Comparison of NoSQL Data Stores},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications},
doi = {10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100244},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2019.0100244},
year = {2019},
publisher = {The Science and Information Organization},
volume = {10},
number = {2},
author = {Sarah H. Kamal and Hanan H. Elazhary and Ehab E. Hassanein}
}



Copyright Statement: This is an open access article licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, even commercially as long as the original work is properly cited.

IJACSA

Upcoming Conferences

IntelliSys 2025

28-29 August 2025

  • Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Future Technologies Conference 2025

6-7 November 2025

  • Munich, Germany

Healthcare Conference 2026

21-22 May 2026

  • Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Computing Conference 2026

9-10 July 2026

  • London, United Kingdom

IntelliSys 2026

3-4 September 2026

  • Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Computer Vision Conference 2026

15-16 October 2026

  • Berlin, Germany
The Science and Information (SAI) Organization
BACK TO TOP

Computer Science Journal

  • About the Journal
  • Call for Papers
  • Submit Paper
  • Indexing

Our Conferences

  • Computing Conference
  • Intelligent Systems Conference
  • Future Technologies Conference
  • Communication Conference

Help & Support

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

© The Science and Information (SAI) Organization Limited. All rights reserved. Registered in England and Wales. Company Number 8933205. thesai.org