Abstract: This research describes learning achievement assessment technology, especially proctor technology. This study compares and contrasts proctoring and non-proctoring procedures used for online exams. The sample case used was the test scores of students enrolled in Hasanuddin University's Indonesian Arabic translation course. The research method used was a non-experimental quantitative method that compared students' online test results using proctoring and non-proctoring systems during online exams. The test scores of 101 students (40 male and 61 female students) from two different classes were sampled. The results of the tests for both classes were collected six times: three times using the proctoring method and three times using the non-proctoring system. A trend analysis was performed on the data. SPSS 26 was used to analyze the data via the two-way ANOVA procedure. The results indicate that the online proctoring system resulted in lower test scores than the online non-proctoring system, while the variables of class and gender did not affect the learning results.

Yusring Sanusi Baso. “Proctoring and Non-proctoring Systems”. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA) 13.6 (2022). http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130610

@article{Baso2022,
title = {Proctoring and Non-proctoring Systems},
journal = {International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications},
doi = {10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130610},
url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0130610},
year = {2022},
publisher = {The Science and Information Organization},
volume = {13},
number = {6},
author = {Yusring Sanusi Baso}
}